We are pleased to let you know of our new publication, Deterrence in Criminal Justice: Evaluating Certainty versus Severity of Punishment by Valerie Wright, Ph.D. The report addresses a key concern for policy makers regarding whether deterrence is better achieved by increasing the likelihood of apprehension or increasing the severity of sanctions.
Overall, the report concludes that:
• Enhancing the certainty of punishment is far more likely to produce deterrent effects than increasing the severity of punishment.
• Particularly at high levels of incarceration, there is no significant public safety benefit to increasing the severity of sentences by imposing longer prison terms.
• Policies such as “three strikes and you’re out” and mandatory minimum sentences only burden state budgets without increasing public safety.
• Evidence-based approaches would require increasing the certainty of punishment by improving the likelihood of detection.
Read on...
This is from the Sentencing Project. Tom
No comments:
Post a Comment