In response to the news that Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government
bestowed a doctrate upon disgraced former Heritage staffer Jason
Richwine, 24 student groups at the elite university released a strongly
worded letter condemning the decision to approve Richwine’s dissertation:
We are deeply concerned with the academic integrity and
the reputation of Harvard Kennedy School and the University as a whole.
It has been recently made public by the Washington Post and the New York
Times that in 2009 the Kennedy School accepted a dissertation
written by Jason Richwine which claims that “Immigrants living in the US
today do not have the same level of cognitive ability as natives”
(Richwine Dissertation, 26). Richwine goes on to state that “the
prediction that new Hispanic immigrants will have low-IQ children and
grandchildren is difficult to argue against” (Richwine Dissertation, 66)
and argues for an immigration policy based on IQ. Central to his claim
is the idea that certain groups are genetically predisposed to be more
intelligent than others. In his troubling worldview Asians are
generally at the top, with whites in the middle, Hispanics follow, and
African Americans at the bottom (Richwine Dissetation, 74). To justify
his assertions he cites largely discredited sources such as J. Philippe
Rushton whose work enshrines the idea that there are geneticallyrooted
differences in cognitive ability between racial groups.
Read on....
No comments:
Post a Comment