On Monday, August 12, the day Attorney General Eric Holder announced “a 
fundamentally new approach” to the criminal justice system in his speech
 before the American Bar Association in San Francisco, US District Court
 Judge Mark W. Bennett was in his office in Sioux City, Iowa, drafting a
 sentencing opinion in a drug case. An outspoken critic of mandatory 
minimums [see “ Imposing Injustice,”
 November 12, 2012], Bennett is known for writing unusual opinions that 
criticize the sentences he must often hand down. “It’s about trying to 
make the system fairer,” he says, “not just for the defendant in front 
of you, but for others.”
The defendant in this case, a 37-year-old black man named Douglas Young,
 had caught a rare break. He’d pleaded guilty to two charges involving 
twenty-eight grams of crack cocaine—an amount sufficient to trigger two 
five-year mandatory minimum sentences. But he had previously been 
convicted on another crack charge, in Chicago, when he was just 20 years
 old. This single offense, seventeen years ago, meant not only that 
prosecutors could have doubled Young’s mandatory minimum sentence, but 
also that he could have received a maximum sentence of life without 
parole.
Read on...
 
No comments:
Post a Comment