Civil rights groups will be in a Toronto court today, hoping a judge will stop police from using controversial sound cannons during protests.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the Canadian Labour Congress are seeking a court injunction.
Civil rights groups will be in a Toronto court today, hoping a judge will stop police from using controversial sound cannons during protests.
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the Canadian Labour Congress are seeking a court injunction.
G20 protester Albert Petrarca blocks a Pittsburgh police truck last fall carrying a long-range acoustic device, or LRAD, designed to disperse unruly crowds with piercing sound. Toronto police have bought four LRADs in preparation for the G20 summit here.
“Like a root canal” is how G20 protester Albert Petrarca describes the piercing sounds he endured from Pittsburgh police last fall.
“It moves from side to side,” he recalled Thursday of a directional, sonic crowd-dispersal tool introduced at the last summit conference.
“When the (sound) beam moves away from you, it’s annoying background noise,” he said. “When it’s directed at you it’s noxious.”
Read on...
I couldn't help but notice a photograph on Page A16 of today's Washington Post showing demonstrators against the G-20 meeting in Pittsburgh running away from "an ear-splitting siren" used by the police to disperse protesters.
The Washington Post story mentions "sound cannons".
Here's more mention in an AP report:
The marchers did not have a permit and, after a few blocks, police declared it an unlawful assembly. They played an announcement over a loudspeaker ordering people to leave and then police in riot gear moved in to break it up. Authorities also used a crowd-control device that emits a deafening siren-like noise, making it uncomfortable for protesters to remain in the area.