A Gun Ban Won't Reduce Violent Crime
"Despite limited press coverage, Border Security Minister Bill Blair
continues his countrywide consultations on a possible national firearms
ban. While the federal government’s interest in a gun ban is dubious,
the demand for such legislation is not.
For ban proponents, their
credibility hinges on two case studies: the 1996 Australian gun buyback
and the 1997 British gun ban. These events are touted as success stories
— examples of how strict gun control can reduce crime.
But have these initiatives actually proven successful?
Following
the murder of 35 people by a gunman in Port Arthur in 1996, the
Australian government introduced sweeping gun laws under the National
Firearms Agreement. In addition to banning all semi-automatic rifles and
implementing a strict licensing system for handguns, the NFA introduced
a mandatory buyback, requiring all Australians to trade in their
firearms for fair compensation.
The claim made by gun-control
activists is that a causal relationship exists between Australia’s gun
laws and declines in gun deaths. But as is often noted by social
scientists, correlation does not imply causation."
No comments:
Post a Comment