Embracing Technology and Changing the Culture at the NYPD
"In 2015, crime in New York City fell once again, reaching its lowest
level in recent decades. New Yorkers are now safer in the city than they
have been in years, and yet tensions between police officers and the
communities in which they work have continued to mount. The challenge
facing the New York Police Department (NYPD) today is to maintain safe
streets while ushering in a new era of mutual respect between officers
and local communities.
In the last two years, William Bratton has served for a second term
as Commissioner of the New York Police Department. In this time, he led
the NYPD away from aggressive tactics used to crack down on street-level
crime, embracing instead a strategy that balances crime prevention and
community engagement. In Bratton’s words, his second term was focused on
moving the NYPD from a 'warrior' to a 'guardian' policing mindset.
This attempt at cultural change involved new policies regarding
training and recruiting, neighborhood policing, and, perhaps most
visibly, the adoption of social media platforms throughout the NYPD. A
recently-published case study, co-authored by Harvard Law School
Professor Susan Crawford and me, chronicles these organizational
changes, drawing from dozens of interviews conducted by Professor
Crawford starting in 2015. The full white paper, published by the Berkman-Klein Center for Internet and Society, is available here."
Showing posts with label William Bratton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label William Bratton. Show all posts
As Shootings Rise in New York, Police Focus on a Small Number of Young Men http://t.co/j99VyYgrVq
— The NCJA (@thencja) July 21, 2015
It’s Time to End ‘Broken Windows’ Policing
One of Mayor Bill de Blasio’s first acts after being elected this
past November was to reappoint William Bratton as commissioner of New
York City’s police department. Bratton’s reputation rests on his work,
in New York and Los Angeles, as a proponent of so-called “broken
windows” policing. He asserts that aggressively going after very minor
offenses—not merely misdemeanors but infractions like littering, sitting
on stoops and carrying open beer cans—will bring the overall rate of
violent crime down as well. It is this program that has led to the
stopping, frisking and general harassing of millions of New Yorkers, the
overwhelming majority without probable cause.
There were 4.4 million stops by the NYPD between 2004 and 2012. Ten percent of those stops were of whites, 84 percent were of blacks and Latinos. Of those 4.4 million stops, only 6 percent led to an arrest, 6 percent to a summons. The remaining 88 percent resulted in no other action—in other words, they involved unequivocally innocent people.
Read on...
There were 4.4 million stops by the NYPD between 2004 and 2012. Ten percent of those stops were of whites, 84 percent were of blacks and Latinos. Of those 4.4 million stops, only 6 percent led to an arrest, 6 percent to a summons. The remaining 88 percent resulted in no other action—in other words, they involved unequivocally innocent people.
Read on...
Why William Bratton Is the Wrong Man to Lead the New York Police Department
The New York Times is reporting
that New York City Mayor-elect Bill de Blasio has chosen William
Bratton to succeed Ray Kelly as commissioner of the New York Police
Department. This will be Bratton’s second stint in charge of the NYPD;
he also ran the department during the Giuliani administration, and
received much credit for the substantial drop in the city’s crime rate
during his tenure. Since then, Bratton has gone on to command the Los
Angeles Police Department, work in private industry, serve as a criminal
justice commentator on NBC, and, weirdly, be named a Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire. (Bratton narrowly beat out de Blasio’s second choice for the job: Sir Archibald Whitworth of Sussex.)
Bratton will be expected to keep the city safe while simultaneously
renewing New Yorkers’ confidence in a police department that has been
sharply criticized in recent years, most often for its divisive stop-and-frisk policy.
(De Blasio has promised to reform stop-and-frisk, and this will be one
of Bratton’s most important jobs.) There are plenty of reasons to think
that Bratton’s up to the task. He has a reputation as a brilliant
tactician and a lifelong innovator, a leader who’s good with
organizational management and unafraid to delegate authority. He’s also
an ambitious self-promoter who thinks very well of himself. That doesn’t
really bother me: If hustlers and narcissists were disqualified from
holding public office, then every city hall in America would be empty.
But there are a couple of other, more substantial reasons why I think
it’s valid to question whether Bratton is really the best man for the
job.
Read on...
Read on...
Crime by the Numbers
By WILLIAM BRATTON
A RECENT survey of retired New York Police Department personnel strongly implies that the police’s reporting of crime statistics in New York City has been skewed for years, with precinct commanders and others downgrading crimes to make their results look better. According to the survey’s authors, criminologists John Eterno and Eli Silverman, and to spokesmen for the Captains Endowment Association, the pressures exerted by the department’s CompStat crime-tracking program forced commanders and their subordinates to manipulate statistics to protect themselves from abuse at CompStat meetings, where their results were discussed. Nothing could be further from the truth.
CompStat originated on my watch as police commissioner, from 1994 through early 1996, and I acknowledge that it was intended to be a tough system, using rigorous weekly reports to refocus commanders on combating crime. Nevertheless, I believe that very few precinct commanders would downgrade crimes under such pressure — and that there wouldn’t have been much effect on overall crime rates even if they had.
Read on...
An editorial in the New York Times. Tom
CompStat originated on my watch as police commissioner, from 1994 through early 1996, and I acknowledge that it was intended to be a tough system, using rigorous weekly reports to refocus commanders on combating crime. Nevertheless, I believe that very few precinct commanders would downgrade crimes under such pressure — and that there wouldn’t have been much effect on overall crime rates even if they had.
Read on...
An editorial in the New York Times. Tom
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)